A valuable lesson can be learned from observing how (non-prepper) women, as well as feminists (both female and male) fail in the art of war with President Trump.
“It is only one who is thoroughly acquainted with the evils of war that can thoroughly understand the profitable way of carrying it on.” -Sun Tzu, the Art of War
In politics, you don’t win unless you’re on the offensive. The mistake liberals and feminists are making is assuming Trump is a racist fool.
His statements and tweets are designed to have an outcome beyond the outrage from the left and media.
Look beyond the emotional reaction of his next offensive tweet or TV appearance (he’s sure to make one) and see the true result of his strategy.
The fail with social justice warriors, liberals and feminists is their lack of ability to see past their outrage and indignation.Their thin skin and delicate sensibilities are their weakness.
Trump repeatedly exploits their emotions with crushing effect.
“Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgment.” -Mario Puzo The Godfather
This is why his tactic works. He evokes outrage in his opponents. He causes people to be so upset that they’re too busy defending themselves, virtue signaling and calling him names that they miss his true purpose. It pains me to see the people who dislike him fall for this tactic over and over again.
“There is no greater danger than underestimating your opponent.” – Lao Tzu
Here’s why they can’t learn from their mistake.
They can’t separate the emotion from the tactic.They won’t give credit where it’s due and this blinds them to see it coming again. They feel that acknowledging the effectiveness of the tactic gives it their “ok”.
Here’s an example: For them, giving credit to an abuser for controlling someone through abuse is the same as agreeing with the abuser.
For them, the mere acknowledgment that the threats of violence or actual physical abuse that an abusive person uses to make someone do a certain thing or feel a certain way to get results is the exact same thing as them condoning and being complicit with the abuse or violence.
The way they “feel” takes priority over facts.The way they “feel” is more important even if it goes against reason, logic and observable reality.
“Violence is the gold standard, the reserve that guarantees order. In actuality, it is better than a gold standard, because violence has universal value. Violence transcends the quirks of philosophy, religion, technology and culture. People say that music is a universal language, but a punch in the face hurts the same no matter what language you speak or what kind of music you prefer. If you are trapped in a room with me and I grab a pipe and gesture to strike you with it, no matter who you are, your monkey brain will immediately understand “or else what.”And thereby, a certain order is achieved.” – Jack Donovan
These liberal minded, emotional people are a danger to you during a crisis.
These types of women (and men) will not be able to control their emotions. They will panic and become angry.
Not everybody has abstract thinking, forethought or awareness.A giant majority of the population never even considers that tomorrow may be different than today. They’ve never experienced adversity that challenges their very existence. Besides emergency workers and first responders, you preppers and survivalists are a minority in the extreme sense.
These people will not be able to process the information that their 5 senses will be feeding them during a grid-down SHTF crisis. They won’t be able to separate the emotion from their new, violent world. Safe spaces and political correctness have made them soft.
They are a liability and to be avoided if at all possible. However, that may not always be possible. I recommend you read my post on…
If society has collapsed, the old rules will become more prevalent than ever.
During a civilized society ending disaster, there will also be the dissolution of the welfare state. The cash and prizes the government gives out to women divorcees and single mothers for not being able to provide for themselves will cease to exist.
Without a government, the rule of law and the welfare state, women will have to look to men to protect and provide for them.
Communities will band together and your local feminists will abandon their cause and demand that they are owed provision, protection, help and support just because they’re women.
Groups of people will become physically closer.Family members, friends, acquaintances and even strangers will be in close proximity without the electronic social devices to distract their attention and keep human interaction at a distance.
Socializing at this new intimate “face-to-face” level will bring out or better put, reveal many aspects of human nature that will be new to both male and female.
Things will get primitive.
Problems will start first with the females.
I’m generalizing here of course, but take heed that on a biological level, women are hypergamous.Hypergamy is neither good or bad, it just is.It’s also very important for the woman to have this hardwired into her brain during primitive times where resources are not plentiful.
Hypergamy: Is the instinctual desire of humans of the female sex to discard a current mate when the opportunity arises to latch onto a subsequent mate of higher status due to the hindbrain impetus to find a male with the best ability to provide for her OWN offspring (already spawned or yet-to-be spawned) regardless of investments and commitments made to a current mate.
If a man gets a woman pregnant, he can leave the next day, never have any involvement, and his genes will still propagate.
If a woman gets pregnant, she’s stuck with the burden for a minimum of 9 months. On top of that, for the child to be successful, she has to invest at least another few years.
Since having a child requires so much work from the woman, it’s vitally important to her that she get the best possible genes for the father’s half of the baby.
Her brain subconsciously drives her attraction to the absolute best man available in a particular group.This happens regardless if she’s currently in a committed relationship with someone or not. Mother nature is a bitch.
Now there’s a Special Note about attraction:
The attraction (or sex) drive is different than the relationship structure preference. Women have a hypergamous sex drive and men have a polygamous sex drive.
When it comes to relationships, men have a primary preference for monogamy and woman have a primary preference for polyandry.
What does this mean?
It means women are, by nature, not very good at being loyal to the tribe or their man.They’re quick to seek the favor of men who are stronger and more dominant, whether those men are a part of their in-group or not.
In general, the problems within your brand new survival group will originate with the female behavioral spectrum of the survival group.
(Power is why women sleep with their bosses and not the mailroom boy.)
It’s a mistake to be angry about this or at women directly.It’s ingrained/hardwired into the species.It’s a biological imperative, evolutionary trait.It’s the reason you’re here today.
What you should be aware of is that not everyone understands this about human/female nature.But there are those who do understand. And among those that do, there may be some that’ll use this knowledge of female nature as a weapon.
Just like all men don’t act on their male nature to propagate the species with as many females as they can. Not all women act on their nature to be with the strongest man in the room.
However, with that being said, in the savage new world after the collapse of civilization as we know it, you men will have to up your game and bring more to the table. I mean that literally. You’ll be expected to provide your women more than just a big pay check if you expect sex in exchange for resources.
That brings me to Briffault’s Law.
It would also behoove all you males to understand Briffault’s Law.
“The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place. – Robert Briffault
The Corollaries to Briffault’s Law:
1 – Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.
2 – Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male has provided the benefit (see corollary 1)
3 – A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the degree to which the female trusts the male (which is not bloody likely).
When it comes to women, it’s not about everything you’ve done for them before, it’s completely about what you are doing for her today. So you better think very hard about whether or not the juice is worth the squeeze.
If this is the first time you’re hearing this, you may want to check out my two posts called…